Random Thoughts

This blog is to share my thoughts on different topics. The topics range from the mundane to the exotic, from the serious to the humourous. Your comments are welcome !

There have been a lot of jokes about women drivers, politicians, business people etc.  The general idea behind all these innuendos is that the members of the fairer sex are scatterbrained.  Enough has been written about how women are breaking or trying to break the glass ceiling in different areas. I have no intention of writing another clichéd article on all that.  I just got curious about those women who were the first to go where no woman had ever gone before.  I left out most of the well known fields which have been covered threadbare by numerous books and articles and have attempted to write something about their role in other pursuits. 

Mountain climbing was as manly as it could get in the early days of climbing. But the women were not far off. The earliest mountain climbing women were from Britain. Margaret Jackson (right) was one of the earliest and well known climber who in her mountain climbing career between 1876 and 1889 made around 140 climbs, some in winter. Her days as a climber came to an end in 1889 after she suffered frostbite.  Another notable climber was Katherine Richardson who had 116 climbs to her credit.  Her main claim to fame was her speed.  Once, she reportedly had to spend nearly 45 minutes on the summit after a climb to allow her male guide to recover.  Then there was Elizabeth Le Blond who started the Alpine Ladies Club for women mountaineers.  More about these women and others like them here

We all know about Mary Leakey (left) and her husband L.S.B.Leakey who did pioneering work in Africa on the origin of man.  However, women were collecting fossils much before that. Ethelred Bennet who was born around 1775, was probably the first. Mary Anning lived around the same time [she was featured in a Google doodle] and had some rare finds to her credit.  It is said that the tongue twister "She sells seashells on the seashore" originated from her since she sold her fossils found near the seashore!  The earliest woman entomologist was probably Maria Sibylla Merian, a German who settled down in Amsterdam.  She published her findings on the metamorphosis of insects in 1705.  It was another matter that these women were never invited to any of the scientific academies' meetings nor were they allowed to become members though their work was cited by the male scientists in their own publications. 

My favorite topic though is about women in armed forces.  Throughout history, we have read of women who have governed kingdoms and occasionally led armies (Remember Joan of Arc?). We have also heard of the legendary Amazons in ancient Greek lore. However, the role of women in combat in recorded history is fascinating. The erstwhile Soviet Union in its war against the Germans in the period 1941-45 came the closest to creating all-women fighting units (the number of women in the Red Army was as high as 800,000 according to some estimates). It is another matter that most of these women left military service after the war and though women do serve in the armed forces all over the world today, the scale and magnitude is less compared to the Soviet women during the Second World War. In the Red Army, apart from their usual roles in the medical corps, women served as snipers, machine gunners, mechanics, pilots and a few even drove tanks. Their role is largely forgotten today and there are few authentic sources about their lives and times. After spending considerable time on the internet and trying to separate wheat from the chaff, what I found was fascinating.

The women volunteered in the armed forces but were not always welcomed. When they did join, they faced hostility from their male counterparts, who were uncomfortable with the idea of women soldiers.  But they persisted and finally had their way and even earned the respect of their male counterparts.  The life of a soldier is always tough and in those days, especially in the Soviet Union, they were short of arms and ammunition, planes etc.  And they faced an enemy who had superior weapons.  It takes real courage to serve on the front lines with bombs falling around you and bullets whizzing past.  But many of these unflinching women made a name for themselves.  Women snipers like Lyudmila Pavlichenko, Roza Shanina (in the picture) and Natalya Kovshova are known names, but there were hundreds of others in the Red Army.  

Among the pilots, Marina Raskova (at right, who was sometimes described as the Amelia Earhart of the Soviet Union) and Lydia Litviak (nick named as "The White Rose of Stalingrad") made a name for themselves in their short career.  Marina Raskova was instrumental in creation of three all-women squadrons in the Red Air Force. Inna Pasportnikova was the female mechanic who was assigned to Lydia Litviak.  She has described how difficult the work was and how her male counterparts sympathized with her, but could not help. The infantry division had its own heroines like machine gunners Aliya Moldagulova (below left) and Manshuk Mametova.

Of the female Soviet "tank men" the most well known were Aleksandra Samusenko and Mariya Oktyabrskaya (below right). The latter joined the army after her husband was killed in the war and had reportedly inscribed the words "Fighting Girlfriend" on her tank.
 
These are the ones who were noticed because of their exploits.  They (except Inna) were awarded the "Hero of the Soviet Union" medal, the highest honor. But there were many others who died unsung. Never again has history been witness to such large scale participation of women in war in different roles and I doubt whether this will change in future.  Many modern militaries do not permit women to fight on the front lines though they are permitted to fly aircraft. In a sense, it can be said that the participation of Soviet women in the war was a unique and short-lived experiment, which had mixed results. Many of the women perished in the war and some at a very young age (Roza Shanina and Natalya Kovshova were just 20 & 22 years old respectively when they died). 
I never cease to admire the tenacity of these women who braved bullets, bombs and male prejudice to prove themselves. Incidentally, a good book on some of these women is available here. I guess all these just go to prove that if you really want to, you can do almost anything. The amount of male prejudice that a woman encounters when she tries to enter a hitherto male preserve is something we cannot imagine today.  That these women overcame all that and went on to write their names in history is admirable.  It is unfortunate that the age of internet came too late to chronicle the exploits of these women.  I would have loved to read more about them.

     What did you have for lunch today? What about yesterday? And the day before? Probably the usual stuff with a bit of indulgence here and there, I guess.  That's normal, as most of us are conditioned to eat those foods which we are familiar and comfortable with. Even when we travel, many of us tend to stick to familiar foods and only a few are adventurous enough to venture into the realm of unknown and unfamiliar gastronomic stuffI am definitely not among those few.  But that doesn't stop me from admiring the bravery of Bear Grylls and his ilk who seem to eat almost anything that walks, runs, swims or crawls (Even though I go Yee-uck when I see them munching on sundry creepy crawlies). Yet I do sometimes wonder if our good old Mother Nature has enough in her bosom to feed the ever growing number of humans. If the numbers keep growing at this rate, the gap between the food produced and the needs of the population is likely to become unbridgeable. But this is true only if we continue to think about conventional food, vegetarian and meat.  What if we can find new food sources?  The brave souls who emulate Bear Grylls do exist.  

     Many years ago, before Grylls was even born, the intrepid adventurers led by Thor Heyerdahl on their epic journey from Peru across the Pacific on their reliable raft Kon-Tiki experimented on plankton.  Heyerdahl said that they were fascinated by the sight but repelled by the smell.  You can read his book on the voyage here.  Still, he opined that it was nourishing food and could potentially save ship wrecked people if only they had something to filter the plankton from the water.  His advice was to throw away the phytoplankton, which are tiny plants (described by him as inedible) and the tiny jelly fish (which according to him had a bitter taste) and consume the rest.  It is now known from documents that scientists in Britain tried to "farm" plankton so that the populace could be fed in case of food shortages during the Second World War.  In Spain, two species of phytoplanktons are cultured for consumption.  One danger of large scale harvesting of plankton would be a catastrophic disruption of the oceanic food chain.  Therefore, the Spanish model looks good.

     The other item on the list is insects. Entomophagy involves eating of eggs, larvae, pupa and adult insects.  This is fairly common in parts of Asia . And the 'fad' (if you can call it that) has spread to the West with many farms coming up in Canada and the US. These new-age entrepreneurs say that this is a way to avoid food shortages while eating healthy. And they try to reduce the 'yuck' factor by attractive packaging.  The girl in the picture is reaching out for an insect cheesecake and chances are that we would not be repelled as much as we would have been if we had been offered the insect without the cheesecake.  As some of us would be aware, there is a movement to popularize the eating of insects, which are a rich source of protein and have a low fat content.  An added advantage is the low carbon footprint. What is easier than rearing insects on the naturally available food sources? An ideal food you would think, but for the 'yuck' factor.  But then whoever thought that eating raw fish would be cool one day?  Yet, today sushi is popular in the West.  But the "eat-insects" movement seems to be catching on.  Here are a couple of articles, for the interested:


However, all is not hunky-dory.  Even if people get over the 'yuck' factor, there are safety issues and Government regulations to contend with.  With the amount of insecticides that are being used, chances are high that the insects which are eaten have imbibed dangerous chemicals much above the limits which are safe for human consumption.  And there are regulations to be complied with, which makes the whole business difficult and cumbersome. But there has to be a trade-off somewhere. It is easy to visualize that at the current growth rate of population, it will become increasingly difficult to feed all the people on the existing sources: livestock and crops.  Alternate sources are needed and plankton and insects are the only ones left.  How durable a food resource  plankton would prove to be is difficult to imagine as this 'fad' does not seem to have caught on as much as the other one. I for one, would rather eat plankton however gooey it may look, rather than the creepy-crawlies.  What about you?

About this blog

About Me


Nothing much, just an ordinary person, with ordinary desires and limitations.

Followers